Jargon buster
About GET-IT
GET-IT provides plain language definitions of health research terms
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
These ten questions test your knowledge of why it’s important to carry out fair tests of treatments – medical, surgical, complementary or any other kind – before routinely using them in practice.
Are you a good bullshit detector?
Click “start quiz” to find out!
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Average score |
|
Your score |
|
Congratulations! Your honed nostrils can sniff out bullshit from a mile away.
Well done! There’s room for improvement but you really know your stuff when it comes to bullshit detection.
Hmm, maybe you should think about some critical appraisal training.
Oh dear. The situation is critical. We prescribe an urgent read of Testing Treatments.
Oh dear. A trained monkey would have done better. The prognosis is terrible.
If you would like to read relevant material before answering, click here:
Djulbegovic B, Kumar A, Glasziou P, Miladinovic B, Chalmers I. Trial unpredictability yields predictable therapy gains. Nature 2013:500;395-396.
(Tick any that are true)
Some treatments, such as a chest tube for a collapsed lung or cataract surgery, have such immediate and dramatic effects that a formal comparison group is not needed.
Read more about “dramatic effects“.
Some treatments, such as a chest tube for a collapsed lung or cataract surgery, have such immediate and dramatic effects that a formal comparison group is not needed.
Read more about “dramatic effects“.
If you would like to read relevant material before answering, see: Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Rawlins M, McCulloch P. When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. BMJ 2007;334: 349-351.
From this study, we don’t know whether 90 of 100 people would have been better even without the treatment. Hence a “fair test” generally needs a comparison, or “control”, group of patients.
Read more about why fair comparisons are important.
From this study, we don’t know whether 90 of 100 people would have been better even without the treatment. Hence a “fair test” generally needs a comparison, or “control”, group of patients.
Read more about why fair comparisons are important.
If you would like to read relevant material before answering, consult Testing Treatments interactive.
If you would like to read relevant material before answering, please consult the Action Plan on Testing Treatments interactive.
Tick the criteria you think are most important:
Read more in Fair Tests of Treatments, or download critical appraisal tools from the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
Read more in Fair Tests of Treatments, or download critical appraisal tools from the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
GET-IT provides plain language definitions of health research terms